From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walters v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 2, 2002
812 So. 2d 457 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Summary

holding that a defendant may not plead to an illegal sentence

Summary of this case from Carson v. State

Opinion

No. 5D01-3753.

March 1, 2002. Rehearing Denied April 2, 2002.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Hernando County, Jack Springstead, J.

Wendell Walters, Mayo, pro se.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Ann M. Phillips, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


Wendell Walters appeals the denial of his motion under Rule 3.800, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, in which he claimed that the 70 year sentence he received was illegal because it exceeded the statutory maximum.

In 1990, Walters was sentenced to several 70 year concurrent sentences in two Hernando County cases, 89-948-CF and 90-376-C, pursuant to a plea agreement which also addressed other uncharged crimes. He now complains that the sentences were illegal for the two crimes: (1) kidnaping, a life felony pursuant to section 787.01(2), Florida Statutes (1989) and enhanced by section 775.087(1) for the use of a weapon; and (2) armed sexual battery pursuant to section 794.011(3), Florida Statutes (1989). The life felonies draw the penalties prescribed by section 775.082(3)(a), Florida Statutes (1989). Because Walters crimes were committed after October 1, 1983, his potential sentence was "a term of imprisonment for life or by a term of imprisonment not exceeding 40 years." The concurrent sentences of 70 years exceeded that 40 year maximum and the defendant may not plead to an illegal sentence. Trott v. State, 579 So.2d 807, 808 (Fla. 5th DCA 1991).

The statute provides for a penalty of "imprisonment for life or for a term of years not less than 30 for a life felony committed prior to October 1, 1983."

We vacate the concurrent sentences in these two cases and remand for resentencing. We note that because Walters agreed to a sentence of 70 years in the two cases referenced above, he could still be resentenced to that same term by the imposition of two consecutive terms for those cases. Alternatively, if the trial court finds that Walters cannot be resentenced in a manner which effectuates the intent of the plea agreement, the plea agreement may be voided, giving the State the opportunity to proceed to trial on the above charges and any others that were resolved through the plea agreement. See Latiif v. State, 787 So.2d 834 (Fla. 2001); St. Lawrence v. State, 785 So.2d 728 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Govea v. State, 785 So.2d 638 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001); Laventure v. State, 695 So.2d 859 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997).

Sentence VACATED; REMANDED for resentencing.

HARRIS and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Walters v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 2, 2002
812 So. 2d 457 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

holding that a defendant may not plead to an illegal sentence

Summary of this case from Carson v. State
Case details for

Walters v. State

Case Details

Full title:WENDELL WALTERS, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Apr 2, 2002

Citations

812 So. 2d 457 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

Walters v. Crosby

In a written opinion, the court found that Walters' 70 year sentences exceeded the statutory maximum and were…

United States v. Rashkovski

Derrick Hanna appeals an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. During the pendency of this…