From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walnut Street Associates v. Brokerage Concepts

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District
Mar 12, 2010
990 A.2d 724 (Pa. 2010)

Opinion

No. 636 EAL 2009.

March 12, 2010.

Petition for Allowance of Appeal No. 636 EAL 2009 from the Order of the Superior Court.

Prior report: Pa.Super., 982 A.2d 94.


ORDER


AND NOW, this 12th day of March 2010, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, rephrased for clarity, is:

Did the Superior Court err in adopting and applying Restatement (Second) of Torts § 772(a), and holding that truthful statements could not form the basis of a claim for tortious interference with contractual relations?

Justice ORIE MELVIN did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.


Summaries of

Walnut Street Associates v. Brokerage Concepts

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District
Mar 12, 2010
990 A.2d 724 (Pa. 2010)
Case details for

Walnut Street Associates v. Brokerage Concepts

Case Details

Full title:WALNUT STREET ASSOCIATES, INC., Petitioner v. BROKERAGE CONCEPTS, INC. and…

Court:Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, Eastern District

Date published: Mar 12, 2010

Citations

990 A.2d 724 (Pa. 2010)
990 A.2d 724

Citing Cases

Walnut Street Associates v. Brokerage Concepts

Did the Superior Court err in adopting and applying Restatement (Second) of Torts § 772(a), and holding that…