From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wallace v. Kaiser Aluminum Chemical

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Sep 27, 1991
586 So. 2d 149 (La. 1991)

Opinion

No. 91-C-1317.

September 27, 1991.

APPEAL FROM 34TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, ST. BERNARD PARISH, STATE OF LOUISIANA, HONORABLE MELVYN J.


Plaintiffs' application for writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment of the court of appeal is reversed. The trial judge erred in maintaining the exception of no cause of action. See Mayer v. Valentine Sugars, Inc., 444 So.2d 618 (La. 1984). On the other hand, the court of appeal erred in taking judicial notice of the adjudicative fact that asbestosis and lung cancer in the same person are necessarily causally related. A judicially noticed fact must be one not subject to reasonable dispute. La. Code of Evidence, art. 201. Accordingly, this matter is remanded to the district court for further proceedings consistent with this order.


Summaries of

Wallace v. Kaiser Aluminum Chemical

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Sep 27, 1991
586 So. 2d 149 (La. 1991)
Case details for

Wallace v. Kaiser Aluminum Chemical

Case Details

Full title:TWILA WALLACE, ET AL. v. KAISER ALUMINUM CHEMICAL CORPORATION, ET AL

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Sep 27, 1991

Citations

586 So. 2d 149 (La. 1991)

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Armstrong World

The focal issue to be judicially determined is whether the lung cancer was independently caused by asbestos…

Rando v. Anco Insulations Inc.

The focal issue to be judicially determined is whether the lung cancer was independently caused by asbestos…