From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 2, 1997
692 So. 2d 318 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Opinion

Case No. 96-2173

Opinion filed May 2, 1997

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Volusia County, William C. Johnson, Jr., Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Noel A. Pelella, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Anthony J. Hall, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.


We affirm the judgment of the trial court but strike conditions 18 and 19 of the order of probation requiring payment of investigative costs. See Pazo v. State, 684 So.2d 898 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996).

COBB, SHARP, W. and ANTOON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Walker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
May 2, 1997
692 So. 2d 318 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)
Case details for

Walker v. State

Case Details

Full title:ELIZABETH WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: May 2, 1997

Citations

692 So. 2d 318 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1997)

Citing Cases

Bisson v. State

Imposition of investigative costs under these circumstances is illegal. Walker v. State, 692 So.2d 318 (Fla.…