From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Walker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 26, 1998
718 So. 2d 217 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Summary

upholding trial court's grant of State's motion to declare Walker a sexual predator several months after Walker's sentencing on ground that sexual predator designation is not a sentence but simply recognition of a status

Summary of this case from Moore v. State

Opinion

No. 97-4040

July 29, 1998 Rehearing Denied August 26, 1998

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Roger B. Colton, Judge; L.T. Case No. 96-1009CFA02.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Peggy Natale and Gary Caldwell, Assistant Public Defenders, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Sarah B. Mayer, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


David C. Walker appeals a post-sentencing order declaring him to be a sexual predator pursuant to section 775.21, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1996). We affirm.

Walker was charged in October of 1996, with two counts of lewd assault and one count of sexual battery on a person less than twelve years of age, all crimes allegedly taking place between July 19, 1996, and September 9, 1996. Shortly thereafter the state filed its notice of intent to have Walker declared a sexual predator. Walker subsequently pled guilty to the charges and was sentenced to eight years incarceration followed by ten years probation.

Several months after Walker was sentenced the state filed a second notice of its intent to have Walker declared a sexual predator. In opposition to the motion, Walker argued that because he was not declared a sexual predator at the time of sentencing, the 1996 amendment to section 775.21 allowed the state attorney to bring the issue to the court's attention only if Walker was improperly registered as a sexual predator by the Department of Corrections, the Department of Law Enforcement, or another law enforcement agency. The trial court granted the state's motion and this appeal followed.

We affirm the order designating Walker a sexual predator, rejecting Walker's contention section 775.21 is penal in nature and must be construed in favor of the defendant. The sexual predator designation "is neither a sentence nor a punishment but simply a status resulting from the conviction of certain crimes." Fletcher v. State, 699 So.2d 346, 347 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997). Section 775.21(4)(b)2, Florida Statutes (Supp. 1996), like section 775.21(4)(a)2, allows trial courts to designate offenders who committed their current offenses between October 1, 1995, and October 1, 1996, as sexual predators after they have been sentenced for the current offense. See Collie v. State, 710 So.2d 1000 (Fla.2d DCA 1998). Therefore, the order on appeal is affirmed.

AFFIRMED.

WARNER, POLEN and SHAHOOD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Walker v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Aug 26, 1998
718 So. 2d 217 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

upholding trial court's grant of State's motion to declare Walker a sexual predator several months after Walker's sentencing on ground that sexual predator designation is not a sentence but simply recognition of a status

Summary of this case from Moore v. State

stating that sexual predator designation is neither a sentence nor a punishment but simply a status resulting from the conviction of certain crimes

Summary of this case from State v. Giorgetti
Case details for

Walker v. State

Case Details

Full title:DAVID C. WALKER, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Aug 26, 1998

Citations

718 So. 2d 217 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Saintelien v. State

Rather, it held that such challenges must be raised in separate civil proceedings. Saintelien, 937 So.2d at…

State v. Giorgetti

The cases cited by the State in support of the assertion that this is a regulatory statute deal with the…