From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Waldrop v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 1, 1958
104 So. 2d 567 (Ala. Crim. App. 1958)

Opinion

7 Div. 503.

November 19, 1957. Rehearing Denied April 1, 1958.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Cleburne County, W.D. De Bardelaben, J.

Rowan S. Bone, Miller, Hinton Torbert, Gadsden, for appellant.

The indictment is insufficient to support a conviction. Dotson v. State, 24 Ala. App. 216, 135 So. 159; Jackson v. State, 27 Ala. App. 468, 174 So. 540.

John Patterson, Atty. Gen., and Wm. C. Younger, Asst. Atty. Gen., for State.

The indictment substantially follows the language of the statute and is sufficient. Code 1940, Tit. 29, § 187; Oldham v. State, 37 Ala. App. 251, 67 So.2d 52; Id., 259 Ala. 507, 67 So.2d 55; Mattison v. State, 37 Ala. App. 678, 75 So.2d 682; Id., 261 Ala. 699, 75 So.2d 683; Harris v. State, 32 Ala. App. 519, 27 So.2d 794; Id., 248 Ala. 389, 27 So.2d 797; Jackson v. State, 27 Ala. App. 468, 174 So. 540.


The defendant entered a plea of guilty to an indictment charging that he "did transport, in quantities of five gallons or more, prohibited liquors or beverages, the sale, possession or transportation of which is prohibited by law," etc. He was adjudged guilty by the court and sentenced to the penitentiary for one year and one day.

On appeal it is contended that the indictment is fatally defective because it fails to allege that the transportation of said liquors was "contrary to law," and that said transportation was in a dry county.

The indictment, which was not tested by demurrer or otherwise, substantially followed the language of the statute. Title 29, Section 187, Code; Oldham v. State, 37 Ala. App. 251, 67 So.2d 52, certiorari denied 259 Ala. 507, 67 So.2d 55; Mattison v. State, 37 Ala. App. 678, 75 So.2d 682, certiorari denied 261 Ala. 699, 75 So.2d 683.

The Supreme Court, affirming this court on certiorari in Harris v. State, 248 Ala. 389, 27 So.2d 797, held that an indictment was not void because it did not contain the allegations, the omission of which is insisted upon as rendering the present indictment fatally defective.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Waldrop v. State

Court of Appeals of Alabama
Apr 1, 1958
104 So. 2d 567 (Ala. Crim. App. 1958)
Case details for

Waldrop v. State

Case Details

Full title:Eugene WALDROP v. STATE

Court:Court of Appeals of Alabama

Date published: Apr 1, 1958

Citations

104 So. 2d 567 (Ala. Crim. App. 1958)
104 So. 2d 567

Citing Cases

Hadley v. State

MacDonald Gallion, Atty. Gen., and Dwight W. Bradley, Asst. Atty. Gen., for State. Indictment in statutory…

Waldrop v. State

SIMPSON, Justice. Petition of Eugene Waldrop for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the…