Opinion
September 4, 1951.
Stuart B. Warren, St. Petersburg, for plaintiffs.
Wilson R. Caffee, St. Petersburg, for defendants.
We are of the view that the situation presented by the record does not admit of a certified question proceeding under Supreme Court Rule 38, 30 F.S.A. As appears from the record the trial court made a ruling during the course of the trial that had the effect of concluding the proceeding. Thereafter he certified to this Court the subject matter of his ruling with the request that we advise him whether he had ruled correctly. The remedy, if any existed, was for the aggrieved party to review the ruling by perfecting an appeal. The certificate is denied.
SEBRING, C.J., and TERRELL, CHAPMAN, THOMAS, ADAMS, HOBSON and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.