From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wahl v. Taylor

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 28, 2006
926 So. 2d 488 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Summary

observing that "an order merely granting a motion for summary judgment is not a final order because it does not enter judgment for or against a party"

Summary of this case from Woodfield Cmty. Ass'n, Inc. v. Ortiz

Opinion

No. 2D05-2483.

April 28, 2006.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pinellas County, Bruce Boyer, J.

Richard J. Dafonte and Elizabeth A. Wulff, Largo, for Appellants.

Paul E. Olah, Jr., of Gurley, Dramis, Lazo, Sarasota, for Appellee Home Depot USA, Inc.

No appearance for Appellee Jeffrey S. Taylor.


Phillippa Wahl and Joseph Sullivan appealed an order that granted Home Depot's motion for summary judgment. Because an order merely granting a motion for summary judgment is not a final order, this court, citing Better Government Association of Sarasota County v. State, 802 So.2d 414 (Fla. 2d DCA 2001), entered an order relinquishing jurisdiction to the trial court to give Wahl and Sullivan an opportunity to obtain a final order or face dismissal. In response, Wahl and Sullivan obtained an order stating, "ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Co-Defendants' Motion for Final Summary Judgment is GRANTED in favor of the Co-Defendant HOME DEPOT USA, INC. and against the Plaintiffs PHILLIPPA WAHL and JOSEPH SULLIVAN." In Better Government, we stated that an order merely granting a motion for summary judgment is not a final order because it does not enter judgment for or against a party. Although we directed Wahl's and Sullivan's attention to Better Government in our order relinquishing jurisdiction, they still failed to obtain a final order. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

Jeffrey S. Taylor, individually and d/b/a Affordable Home Improvements and Repairs, is not involved in this appeal.

This court's practice of relinquishing jurisdiction to enable an appellant to obtain an appealable order differs from that of the First and Fifth Districts which automatically dismiss an appeal for lack of jurisdiction if the order appealed is not final. See Arcangeli v. Albertson's, Inc., 550 So.2d 557 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989); Johnson v. First City Bank of Gainesville, 491 So.2d 1217 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986).

Appeal dismissed.

CASANUEVA and VILLANTI, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wahl v. Taylor

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Apr 28, 2006
926 So. 2d 488 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

observing that "an order merely granting a motion for summary judgment is not a final order because it does not enter judgment for or against a party"

Summary of this case from Woodfield Cmty. Ass'n, Inc. v. Ortiz

stating that "an order merely granting a motion for summary judgment is not a final order because it does not enter judgment for or against a party"

Summary of this case from Barco Holdings, LLC v. Terminal Investment Corp.
Case details for

Wahl v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:Phillippa WAHL and Joseph Sullivan, Appellants, v. Jeffrey S. TAYLOR…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Apr 28, 2006

Citations

926 So. 2d 488 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2006)

Citing Cases

Woodfield Cmty. Ass'n, Inc. v. Ortiz

Generally, orders that merely grant partial summary judgment, such as the one before us, are considered…

Wellman v. Wellman

This is also true where the grantee obtains the title in himself, knowing the purpose of the grantor, but…