From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Wade v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 21, 1987
513 So. 2d 1358 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 86-878.

October 21, 1987.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk County; Carolyn K. Fulmer, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and A. Anne Owens, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Katherine V. Blanco, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


The appellant, Geraldine Wade, seeks review of the trial court's judgment and sentence. We affirm the judgment, but reverse the sentence imposed.

The trial court departed from the recommended guidelines range based solely upon the appellant's classification as a habitual offender. Subsequent to the trial court's imposition of sentence, the Florida Supreme Court held that a defendant's habitual offender status is an improper reason to depart from the sentencing guidelines. See Whitehead v. State, 498 So.2d 863 (Fla. 1986).

We, accordingly, reverse the trial court's sentence and remand for resentencing within the recommended guidelines range. We affirm in all other respects.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and LEHAN and FRANK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Wade v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Oct 21, 1987
513 So. 2d 1358 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

Wade v. State

Case Details

Full title:GERALDINE WADE, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Oct 21, 1987

Citations

513 So. 2d 1358 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

Shull v. Dugger

Some of our district courts, however, have distinguished the situation where the only reason given for…

Patterson v. State

We agree that a defendant's habitual offender status is an improper reason to depart from the sentencing…