From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vollemans v. Town of Wallingford

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Sep 26, 2007
933 A.2d 722 (Conn. 2007)

Opinion

Decided September 26, 2007


The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 103 Conn. App. 188 (AC 27332), is granted, limited to the following issues:

"1. In interpreting General Statutes § 46a-82 (e), did the Appellate Court properly hold that the statute of limitations began to run on the last day the plaintiff worked?

"2. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that summary judgment was inappropriate because (a) there was a genuine issue of material fact regarding the notice of termination and (b) there was a genuine issue of material fact regarding pretext?"
Michael J. Rose and Johanna G. Zelman, in support of the petition.

John-Henry M. Steele, in opposition.

SCHALLER, J. did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.


Summaries of

Vollemans v. Town of Wallingford

Supreme Court of Connecticut
Sep 26, 2007
933 A.2d 722 (Conn. 2007)
Case details for

Vollemans v. Town of Wallingford

Case Details

Full title:PETER J. VOLLEMANS, JR. v. TOWN OF WALLINGFORD

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut

Date published: Sep 26, 2007

Citations

933 A.2d 722 (Conn. 2007)
284 Conn. 920

Citing Cases

Vollemans v. Wallingford

Did the Appellate Court properly determine that summary judgment was inappropriate because (a) there was a…