From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vlasich v. Fishback

United States District Court, E.D. California, Fresno Division
Nov 27, 2007
1:05-cv-01615 LJO-GSA (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 27, 2007)

Opinion

1:05-cv-01615 LJO-GSA (PC).

New Deadline: 12/24/2007

November 27, 2007


ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT VILLA'S FIRST REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (Document #30)


Plaintiff is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 19, 2007, defendant Villa filed a request for an extension of time to file a response to the complaint. Good cause having been presented to the court and GOOD CAUSE APPEARING THEREFOR, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the request is granted, and defendant Villa's response to plaintiff's complaint is due on or before December 24, 2007 .

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Vlasich v. Fishback

United States District Court, E.D. California, Fresno Division
Nov 27, 2007
1:05-cv-01615 LJO-GSA (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 27, 2007)
Case details for

Vlasich v. Fishback

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN VLASICH, Plaintiff, v. DR. TIMOTHY FISHBACK, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California, Fresno Division

Date published: Nov 27, 2007

Citations

1:05-cv-01615 LJO-GSA (PC) (E.D. Cal. Nov. 27, 2007)

Citing Cases

Matthews v. Caliber Home Loans

However, as Defendants correctly aver, "there is no recognized civil cause of action for forgery." Kraif v.…

Copeland v. Ostler (In re Copeland)

Id., 2010 WL 3062690 at *4. See Sohal v. City of Merced Police Department, 2009 WL 961465, at *7 (E.D. Cal.…