Opinion
No. 20-40359
10-28-2022
Priscilla VILLARREAL, Plaintiff—Appellant, v. The CITY OF LAREDO, TEXAS; Webb County, Texas ; Isidro R. Alaniz ; Marisela Jacaman; Claudio Trevino, Jr.; Juan L. Ruiz; Deyanria Villarreal; Enedina Martinez ; Alfredo Guerrero; Laura Montemayor ; Does 1-2, Defendants—Appellees.
JT Morris, JT Morris Law, P.L.L.C., Austin, TX, Conor T. Fitzpatrick, Attorney, Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone, P.L.C., Detroit, MI, Darpana Sheth, Esq., Foundation for Individual Rights & Expression (FIRE), Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant. William Michael McKamie, Esq., Taylor Olson Adkins Sralla & Elam, L.L.P., Alicia K. Kreh, Taylor, Olson, Adkins, Sralla & Elam, L.L.P., Fort Worth, TX, for Defendants-Appellees City of Laredo, Texas, Claudio Trevino, Jr., Juan L. Ruiz, Deyanria Villarreal, Enedina Martinez, Alfredo Guerrero, Laura Montemayor, Does 1-2. Jason Eric Magee, Allison, Bass & Magee, L.L.P., Austin, TX, for Defendants-Appellees Webb County, Texas, Isidro R. Alaniz, Marisela Jacaman.
JT Morris, JT Morris Law, P.L.L.C., Austin, TX, Conor T. Fitzpatrick, Attorney, Miller, Canfield, Paddock & Stone, P.L.C., Detroit, MI, Darpana Sheth, Esq., Foundation for Individual Rights & Expression (FIRE), Washington, DC, for Plaintiff-Appellant.
William Michael McKamie, Esq., Taylor Olson Adkins Sralla & Elam, L.L.P., Alicia K. Kreh, Taylor, Olson, Adkins, Sralla & Elam, L.L.P., Fort Worth, TX, for Defendants-Appellees City of Laredo, Texas, Claudio Trevino, Jr., Juan L. Ruiz, Deyanria Villarreal, Enedina Martinez, Alfredo Guerrero, Laura Montemayor, Does 1-2.
Jason Eric Magee, Allison, Bass & Magee, L.L.P., Austin, TX, for Defendants-Appellees Webb County, Texas, Isidro R. Alaniz, Marisela Jacaman.
Before Richman, Chief Judge, and Jones, Smith, Stewart, Dennis, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, and Wilson, Circuit Judges.
Per Curiam:
A member of the court having requested a poll on the petitions for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor,
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs. Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 41.3, the panel opinion in this case dated August 12, 2022, is VACATED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition for rehearing filed September 9, 2022, is DENIED AS MOOT.