From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Viera v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 26, 2010
35 So. 3d 1005 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

Summary

remanding for resentencing

Summary of this case from Viera v. State

Opinion

No. 3D07-3300.

May 26, 2010.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Bertila Soto, Judge.

Carlos J. Martinez, Public Defender, and Andrew Stanton, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Forrest L. Andrews, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE and GERSTEN, JJ., and SCHWARTZ, Senior Judge.


This is an appeal from a conviction and a 40 year sentence for trafficking in heroin. We find no trial error and therefore affirm the conviction. However, after consideration of the circumstances surrounding the sentence in light of the factors stated in Wilson v. State, 845 So.2d 142, 156 (Fla. 2003), particularly the judge's enthusiastic advocacy of the State's pretrial offer of a ten year sentence in return for a guilty plea, and the unexplained 40 year sentence (the offense carried a 25 year mandatory minimum) which was imposed after the trial which followed the defendant's rejection of the offer, we must conclude that the sentence was, in legal parlance, "vindictive," requiring resentencing by another judge. See Brandful v. State, 858 So.2d 367 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003); Compare Ducks-worth v. State, 26 So.3d 74 (Fla. 3d DCA 2010).

Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded.


Summaries of

Viera v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
May 26, 2010
35 So. 3d 1005 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

remanding for resentencing

Summary of this case from Viera v. State
Case details for

Viera v. State

Case Details

Full title:Nelson VIERA, Appellant, v. The STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: May 26, 2010

Citations

35 So. 3d 1005 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2010)

Citing Cases

Viera v. State

The order on appeal, however, does not address the seven issues raised in the Rule 3.850 petition filed…