From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Victory v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 17, 1982
422 So. 2d 67 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Summary

In Victory, pursuant to section 812.025, the Second District reversed a defendant's conviction for dealing in stolen property based on a plea of nolo contendere after he was previously convicted of grand theft.

Summary of this case from Blackmon v. State

Opinion

No. 81-1608.

November 17, 1982.

Jerry Hill, Public Defender, and Paul C. Helm, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Michael A. Palecki, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


The defendant stole some tractor-trailers in Pasco County. On the same date, he took the trailers to Manatee County and sold them to Ramon Garcia for $4,500 in cash and a $3,000 note. The defendant was convicted of grand theft in Pasco County.

This appeal arises from Manatee County, where the defendant was charged with dealing in stolen property and grand theft. The grand theft charge was based on the defendant's obtaining money and a note from Garcia by falsely representing that he had clear title to the trailers. The defendant's motion to dismiss the charges in Manatee County was denied. The defendant then pled nolo contendere reserving his right to appeal the denial of the motion to dismiss. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Section 812.025, Florida Statutes (1981), forbids convictions for both theft and dealing in stolen property in connection with one scheme or course of conduct. The defendant having been convicted of grand theft in Pasco County, he may not also be convicted in Manatee County for the offense of dealing in the property stolen. Kelly v. State, 397 So.2d 709 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981). We reverse as to that conviction.

However, we see no impediment to the conviction in Manatee County for grand theft based upon the fact that the defendant obtained Garcia's money and note by falsely representing that he had clear title to the trailers. Section 775.021(4), Fla. Stat. (1981); Borges v. State, 415 So.2d 1265 (Fla. 1982). Therefore, we affirm the grand theft conviction.

REVERSED in part and AFFIRMED in part.

HOBSON, A.C.J., and GRIMES, J., concur.


Summaries of

Victory v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Nov 17, 1982
422 So. 2d 67 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

In Victory, pursuant to section 812.025, the Second District reversed a defendant's conviction for dealing in stolen property based on a plea of nolo contendere after he was previously convicted of grand theft.

Summary of this case from Blackmon v. State

In Victory v. State, 422 So.2d 67 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982), a defendant was charged with dealing in stolen property and grand theft.

Summary of this case from Hall v. State
Case details for

Victory v. State

Case Details

Full title:ROGER VICTORY, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Nov 17, 1982

Citations

422 So. 2d 67 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

Hall v. State

PER CURIAM. We have for review Hall v. State, 767 So.2d 560 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000), which certified a direct…

Hall v. State

The State argues that a jury verdict is necessary for this statute to apply and that it does not apply to…