From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Venturi v. Boyd

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHWESTERN DIVISION
Nov 10, 2014
Case No. 3:14-cv-00823-CLS-TMP (N.D. Ala. Nov. 10, 2014)

Opinion

Case No. 3:14-cv-00823-CLS-TMP

11-10-2014

PATRICK JAMES VENTURI, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT BOYD, et al., Defendants.


MEMORANDUM OF OPINION

The magistrate judge filed a report on October 14, 2014, recommending that this action be dismissed with prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1). The plaintiff filed objections to the report and recommendation on October 24, 2014. A review of the objections shows them to be without merit.

Accordingly, having carefully reviewed and considered de novo all the materials in the court file, including the report and recommendation and the objections thereto, the Court is of the opinion that the magistrate judge's report is due to be, and it hereby is, ADOPTED, and the recommendation is ACCEPTED. Therefore, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(1), this action is due to be dismissed with prejudice for failing to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. A Final Judgment will be entered contemporaneously herewith.

DONE this 10th day of November, 2014.

/s/_________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Venturi v. Boyd

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHWESTERN DIVISION
Nov 10, 2014
Case No. 3:14-cv-00823-CLS-TMP (N.D. Ala. Nov. 10, 2014)
Case details for

Venturi v. Boyd

Case Details

Full title:PATRICK JAMES VENTURI, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT BOYD, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA NORTHWESTERN DIVISION

Date published: Nov 10, 2014

Citations

Case No. 3:14-cv-00823-CLS-TMP (N.D. Ala. Nov. 10, 2014)

Citing Cases

Thompson v. Nichols

It is doubtful plaintiff's thirteen-pound weight loss (from 160 lbs to 147 lbs) independently constitutes an…

Munson v. Wilcher

As before, plaintiff's claims that the prison food is calorically low is merely conclusory and insufficient…