From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Venanzio v. Weir

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1901
64 App. Div. 483 (N.Y. App. Div. 1901)

Opinion

October Term, 1901.

Achille J. Oishei [ Nelson L. Keach with him on the brief], for the appellant.

Arnold W. Sherman [ Eugene Lamb Richards, Jr., with him on the brief], for the respondent.


The sole ground of the motion was that section 3268 of the Code of Civil Procedure violates the fourteenth amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America. This amendment merely requires that all persons subjected to legislation shall receive like treatment under like circumstances and conditions. Class legislation discriminating against some and favoring others is prohibited; but legislation which, carrying out a public purpose, is limited in its application, if within the sphere of its operation it affects alike all persons similarly situated, is not within the amendment. ( Barbier v. Connolly, 113 U.S. 27, 32; Missouri v. Lewis, 101 id. 22; Hayes v. Missouri, 120 id. 68; Conley v. Woonsocket Institution for Savings, 11 R.I. 147.)

The order should be affirmed, without costs.

GOODRICH, P.J., WOODWARD, HIRSCHBERG and SEWELL, JJ., concurred.

Order affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Venanzio v. Weir

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 1, 1901
64 App. Div. 483 (N.Y. App. Div. 1901)
Case details for

Venanzio v. Weir

Case Details

Full title:COCCO VENANZIO, by his Guardian ad Litem, SALVATORE VENANZIO, Appellant, v…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 1, 1901

Citations

64 App. Div. 483 (N.Y. App. Div. 1901)
72 N.Y.S. 234