From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Velasquez-Pasos v. Holder

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Mar 10, 2014
No. 10-73066 (9th Cir. Mar. 10, 2014)

Opinion

No. 10-73066 Agency No. A099-836-124 Agency No. A099-475-043

03-10-2014

ESTUARDO VELASQUEZ-PASOS, a.k.a. Armando Diaz Pazos; CARLA LOPEZ-GARCIA, a.k.a. Suni Salguero, Petitioners, v. ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Respondent.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


On Petition for Review of an Order of the

Board of Immigration Appeals

Before: PREGERSON, LEAVY, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

Estuardo Velasquez-Pasos and Carla Lopez-Garcia, natives and citizens of Guatemala, petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals' ("BIA") order denying their motion to reconsider. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reconsider, Mohammed v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 785, 791 (9th Cir. 2005), and de novo questions of law, Cordoba v. Holder, 726 F.3d 1106, 1113 (9th Cir. 2013). We grant the petition for review and remand.

In denying petitioners' motion to reconsider, the BIA determined that "landowners in Guatemala" is not cognizable as a particular social group. In light of our decision in Cordoba, 726 F.3d 1106, 1114 (recognizing landownership may form the basis of a particular social group), we remand for further proceedings consistent with this disposition. See INS v. Ventura, 537 U.S. 12, 16-18 (2002) (per curiam).

PETITION FOR REVIEW GRANTED; REMANDED.


Summaries of

Velasquez-Pasos v. Holder

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Mar 10, 2014
No. 10-73066 (9th Cir. Mar. 10, 2014)
Case details for

Velasquez-Pasos v. Holder

Case Details

Full title:ESTUARDO VELASQUEZ-PASOS, a.k.a. Armando Diaz Pazos; CARLA LOPEZ-GARCIA…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 10, 2014

Citations

No. 10-73066 (9th Cir. Mar. 10, 2014)