From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Veiga v. Veiga

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jul 13, 1990
563 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Summary

finding that “spousal support obligation during coverture includes liability ... for ... prejudgment attorney's fees and cannot be contracted away”

Summary of this case from Schecter v. Schecter

Opinion

No. 89-1121.

May 31, 1990. Rehearing Denied July 13, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Volusia County, Edwin P.B. Sanders, J.

Jason G. Reynolds of Coble, Barkin, Rothert, Gordon, Morris, Lewis Reynolds, Daytona Beach, for appellant/cross-appellee.

Allison E. Folds of Watson, Folds, Steadham, Christmann, Brashear, Tovkach Walker, Gainesville, for appellee/cross-appellant.


This appeal is taken from a final judgment of dissolution of marriage. Timely motions for rehearing were filed, resulting in an order of the trial court denying the motions for rehearing "without prejudice to the matters being considered following the conclusion of pending [unrelated] litigation involving Eagle Flight Center, Inc., for which the court retains jurisdiction". The threshold issue is whether the court is presented with a final appealable judgment. We conclude that the judgment became final upon the court's express denial of the motion for rehearing and that the above-quoted language is ineffective to indefinitely hold the judgment in abeyance. Having determined jurisdiction exists, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed in all respects except for the refusal to award attorney's fees based on the prenuptial agreement. Florida law is clear that a husband's spousal support obligation during coverture includes liability (as determined using the usual need/ability to pay test) for a wife's prejudgment attorney's fees and cannot be contracted away in a prenuptial agreement. See, e.g., Fechtel v. Fechtel, 556 So.2d 520 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990). This cause is remanded for consideration of the merits of the wife's attorney's fees claim.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

DAUKSCH, J., concurs.

COWART, J., dissents without opinion.


Summaries of

Veiga v. Veiga

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Jul 13, 1990
563 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

finding that “spousal support obligation during coverture includes liability ... for ... prejudgment attorney's fees and cannot be contracted away”

Summary of this case from Schecter v. Schecter
Case details for

Veiga v. Veiga

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM VEIGA, III, APPELLANT/CROSS-APPELLEE, v. TERI LYNN VEIGA…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Jul 13, 1990

Citations

563 So. 2d 1089 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

Schecter v. Schecter

in Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980), that the purpose of a fee award in dissolution action…

Lawhon v. Lawhon

It is well settled that a husband's obligation to provide spousal support during the term of the marriage…