From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Associates

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Feb 4, 1994
633 So. 2d 158 (La. 1994)

Summary

In Veazey and Howard, the court discussed some of the conceptual difficulties in applying comparative fault principles in the context of strict liability.

Summary of this case from Dunn v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

Opinion

No. 93-C-2818.

February 4, 1994.

In re Southmark Management Corp.; — Defendant(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 93-CA-0284; Parish of Jefferson, 24th Judicial District Court, Div. "E", No. 372-321.


Granted.

HALL, J., not on panel.


Summaries of

Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Associates

Supreme Court of Louisiana
Feb 4, 1994
633 So. 2d 158 (La. 1994)

In Veazey and Howard, the court discussed some of the conceptual difficulties in applying comparative fault principles in the context of strict liability.

Summary of this case from Dunn v. Consolidated Rail Corp.
Case details for

Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Associates

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTI VEAZEY v. ELMWOOD PLANTATION ASSOCIATES, LTD. AND SOUTHMARK…

Court:Supreme Court of Louisiana

Date published: Feb 4, 1994

Citations

633 So. 2d 158 (La. 1994)

Citing Cases

Veazey v. Elmwood Plantation Asso.

On Southmark's application, we granted certiorari to consider the correctness of the court of appeal's…

Perez v. Boh Bros. Construction Co.

Boh Brothers settled with both Perez and Kelly prior to trial and consequently is not directly involved in…