From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Vann v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 31, 2001
801 So. 2d 326 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Opinion

Case No. 1D01-2826

Opinion filed December 31, 2001.

An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Bay County. Don T. Sirmons, Judge.

Nancy Daniels, Public Defender, and Anne H. Dunlap, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Alan R. Dakan, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for appellee.


As the state correctly concedes, the trial court erred in imposing a departure sentence based on factors underlying the revocation of appellant's probation. See Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla. 1989);see also Routenberg v. State, 677 So.2d 1325 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996). Accordingly, we reverse the sentence imposed upon revocation of probation and remand for resentencing within the guidelines. No motion for rehearing will be entertained and the clerk is directed to issue mandate forthwith.

PADOVANO, BROWNING and LEWIS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Vann v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Dec 31, 2001
801 So. 2d 326 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)
Case details for

Vann v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARCUS VANN, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Dec 31, 2001

Citations

801 So. 2d 326 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2001)

Citing Cases

Bush v. State

We also agree with Bush that the trial court's stated basis for the departure sentence, that "the violation…