From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Van Ryn v. Korean Air Lines

United States District Court, C.D. California
Feb 15, 1985
640 F. Supp. 283 (C.D. Cal. 1985)

Opinion

No. 84 6525 PAR

February 15, 1985


TEMPORARY STAY ORDER


Korean Air Lines has filed an ex parte application for reconsideration of this Court's Order to remand this action. After reviewing the papers submitted in support, the Court noted a serious question about its jurisdiction to entertain the Application. The Court accordingly requested counsel for Van Ryn to participate (by telephone conference) with counsel for Korean Air Lines in a proceeding with respect to the Application. Counsel for both parties did participate, and all discussion pertaining to the pending matter was reported. By making himself available to the Court for this purpose, counsel for Van Ryn did not waive whatever right plaintiff may wish to assert that the Court lacks jurisdiction to require plaintiff's participation and that no appearance is necessary.

Korean Air Lines argues that the Court has jurisdiction because no certified copy of the order of remand has been mailed by the clerk of this court under 28 U.S.C. § 1447 (c). Good cause appearing, see Bucy v. Nevada Const. Co., 125 F.2d 213, 217 (9th Cir. 1942), and in order to preserve the court's ability to consider its own jurisdiction, it is hereby ordered that the status quo in connection with the Case No. CV 84-6525 PAR be maintained and that the Clerk of this Court shall not perform any act in connection with this action, including specifically certifying or mailing any copy of the Order to Remand, from the time of entry of this Order to and including 4:30 P.M. Friday, February 22, 1985, except for receipt of papers lodged or filed by the parties.


Summaries of

Van Ryn v. Korean Air Lines

United States District Court, C.D. California
Feb 15, 1985
640 F. Supp. 283 (C.D. Cal. 1985)
Case details for

Van Ryn v. Korean Air Lines

Case Details

Full title:Terry VAN RYN, Plaintiff, v. KOREAN AIR LINES et al., Defendant

Court:United States District Court, C.D. California

Date published: Feb 15, 1985

Citations

640 F. Supp. 283 (C.D. Cal. 1985)

Citing Cases

Whiddon Farms, Inc; v. Delta Pine Land Co.

In light of the fact that none of the cases cited by this treatise go so far as to say that it is the act of…

Van Ryn v. Korean Air Lines

On the merits of its motion, defendant urged the Court to reconsider its ruling regarding the Death on the…