From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Valle-Sanchez

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 20, 1997
131 F.3d 150 (9th Cir. 1997)

Summary

finding that the district court granted defendant's motion to dismiss even though the government conceded the propriety of dismissing the indictment

Summary of this case from United States v. Irizarry-Colon

Opinion


131 F.3d 150 (9th Cir. 1997) UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carmelo VELLE-SANCHEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 94-50556. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit November 20, 1997

Editorial Note:

This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA9 Rule 36-3 regarding use of unpublished opinions)

Submitted November 17, 1997

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California

Before: HUG, Chief Judge, PREGERSON AND BEEZER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3.

Carmelo Valle-Sanchez appeals his guilty plea conviction and sentence for illegal reentry of a deported alien following a felony conviction in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Valle-Sanchez's counsel has submitted a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Because our review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83 (1988), discloses no meritorious issues for review, we AFFIRM the district court's judgment and GRANT the motion of counsel to withdraw.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Valle-Sanchez

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nov 20, 1997
131 F.3d 150 (9th Cir. 1997)

finding that the district court granted defendant's motion to dismiss even though the government conceded the propriety of dismissing the indictment

Summary of this case from United States v. Irizarry-Colon
Case details for

U.S. v. Valle-Sanchez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carmelo VELLE-SANCHEZ…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 20, 1997

Citations

131 F.3d 150 (9th Cir. 1997)

Citing Cases

United States v. Irizarry-Colon

Furthermore, other circuits have found that a district court dismissed an indictment on a defendant's motion…

Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe of Mich. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Mich.

See Slamen v. Paul Revere Life Ins. Co., 166 F.3d 1102, 1105 (11th Cir. 1999) ("'[N]on-ERISA benefits do not…