From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Tubbs

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Oct 21, 2011
446 F. App'x 705 (5th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 10-51043

10-21-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. THOMAS MADISON TUBBS, Defendant-Appellant


Conference Calendar


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the Western District of Texas

USDC No. 7:10-CR-137-1

Before BENAVIDES, DENNIS, and SOUTHWICK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Thomas Madison Tubbs presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Harrimon, 568 F.3d 531 (5th Cir. 2009), which held that the Texas state offense of evading arrest or detention by use of a vehicle is a violent felony under the Armed Career Criminal Act (ACCA). Recently, the Supreme Court validated our decision in Harrimon by holding that a conviction under Indiana's felony vehicle flight law constituted a violent felony under the ACCA. See Sykes v. United States, 131 S. Ct. 2267, 2277 (2011).

Accordingly, the Government's motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

United States v. Tubbs

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Oct 21, 2011
446 F. App'x 705 (5th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

United States v. Tubbs

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. THOMAS MADISON TUBBS…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Oct 21, 2011

Citations

446 F. App'x 705 (5th Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

United States v. Hornyak

We have held in several unpublished opinions that Sykes validated our decision in Harrimon. See United States…