From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Summit Refrigeration Group, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Oct 26, 2006
Case No. 05-CR-151 (E.D. Wis. Oct. 26, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 05-CR-151.

October 26, 2006


ORDER


The defendants in the above captioned case filed objections to Magistrate Judge Patricia Gorence's Recommendations to this Court that the defendants' various motions be denied. All of the defendants brought motions to suppress physical evidence, suppress the search warrant as overly broad, suppress the seizures pursuant to said search warrant, dismiss the indictment on various grounds, including the ground that said indictment is duplicitous and multiplicitous. The Magistrate Judge's recommendations to this Court are dated August 31, 2006, September 11, 2006, and October 4, 2006.

The Court has reviewed the record and the submissions of the parties and rules as follows. The Magistrate Judge's Recommendations to this Court dated August 31, 2006, September 11, 2006, and October 4, 2006, are adopted by this Court in toto. Therefore, the defendants' objections to said Recommendations are DENIED.

Dated at Milwaukee, Wisconsin, this 26th day of October, 2006.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Summit Refrigeration Group, Inc.

United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Oct 26, 2006
Case No. 05-CR-151 (E.D. Wis. Oct. 26, 2006)
Case details for

U.S. v. Summit Refrigeration Group, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. SUMMIT REFRIGERATION GROUP, INC.…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Date published: Oct 26, 2006

Citations

Case No. 05-CR-151 (E.D. Wis. Oct. 26, 2006)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. D'Amico

Ordinarily, it has been thought that attempt is a lesser-included offense of the completed crime and need not…

U.S. v. Case

See Soape, 169 F.3d at 266-67. See also Nguyen, 28 F.3d at 482 ("An offense is separate and distinct when…