From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Stern

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Jul 16, 1993
932 F. Supp. 277 (M.D. Fla. 1993)

Summary

modifying prior order to require defendant rather than the government to pay relator's fees and costs in light of express statutory language

Summary of this case from U.S. ex Rel. Smith v. Gilbert Realty Co.

Opinion

No. 90-153-CIV-T-17

July 16, 1993.

Warren A. Zimmerman, U.S. Attorney's Office, Middle District of Florida, Tampa, FL, Patricia D. Kenny, Barnett Kenny, P.A., Miami, FL, Michael F. Hertz, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Civil Division, Washington, DC, for plaintiff U.S.

Arnold D. Levine, Levine, Hirsch, Segall Northcutt, P.A., Tampa, FL, for defendants Mark S. Stern, M.D., P.A., Mark S. Stern.

Edward J. Garcia, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Legal Affairs Dept., Jacksonville, FL, for garnishee Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Florida, Inc.

Patrick William Skelton, Bruce H. Roberson, Holland Knight, Tampa, FL, for garnishee Suntrust Bank fka Sun Bank of Tampa Bay.


Prior report: 818 F. Supp. 1521.

ORDER


This cause is before the Court on United States' Motion for Reconsideration (Dkt. 37), and Relators' Reply to Motion (Dkt. 38).

The Court reiterates that portion of its prior Order (Dkt. 36) which awarded $36,-473.70 to Relators. The Court vacates that part of the Order which grants $26,160 as a reasonable attorney's fee, and $931.89 as costs, both to be paid by the United States. The False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(d)(1) expressly provides that fees and costs be taxed against Defendant, in this case Mark S. Stern and Mark S. Stern, M.D. P.A. The Court erred in taxing such fees and costs against the Government. Accordingly, it is

ORDERED that the Motion for Reconsideration is granted, and Defendants shall pay to Relators $26,160 as a reasonable attorney's fee and $931.89 as costs.

DONE and ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Stern

United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division
Jul 16, 1993
932 F. Supp. 277 (M.D. Fla. 1993)

modifying prior order to require defendant rather than the government to pay relator's fees and costs in light of express statutory language

Summary of this case from U.S. ex Rel. Smith v. Gilbert Realty Co.

stating explicitly that "the Court erred in taxing such fees and costs against the Government"

Summary of this case from U.S. ex Rel. Smith v. Gilbert Realty Co.
Case details for

U.S. v. Stern

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Mark S. STERN and Mark S. Stern…

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division

Date published: Jul 16, 1993

Citations

932 F. Supp. 277 (M.D. Fla. 1993)

Citing Cases

U.S. ex Rel. Smith v. Gilbert Realty Co.

Although the issue has not been frequently litigated, at least one federal district court has held that in a…

U.S. v. Walgreen Co.

The text of the qui tam attorney's fees provision, 31 U.S.C. § 3730(d), does not address the question of who…