From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Ross

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 28, 2010
399 F. App'x 830 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 10-7134.

Submitted: October 19, 2010.

Decided: October 28, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Newport News. Rebecca Beach Smith, District Judge. (2:06-cr-00056-RBS-FBS-1).

Charles Thomas Ross, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Westley Haynie, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before DUNCAN, KEENAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Charles Thomas Ross appeals the district court's order denying his motion filed pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Ross, No. 2:06-cr00056-RBS-FBS-1 (E.D. Va. June 22, 2010); see United States v. Goodwyn, 596 F.3d 233 (4th Cir. 2010) (holding district court lacked authority to grant defendant's motion to reconsider seeking further reduction of his sentence). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Ross

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Oct 28, 2010
399 F. App'x 830 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Ross

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Charles Thomas ROSS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Oct 28, 2010

Citations

399 F. App'x 830 (4th Cir. 2010)