From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Ortega-Estrada

United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division
Oct 22, 2008
CRIMINAL FILE NO. 1:07-CR-356-TWT (N.D. Ga. Oct. 22, 2008)

Opinion

CRIMINAL FILE NO. 1:07-CR-356-TWT.

October 22, 2008


ORDER


This is a criminal action. It is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [Doc. 221] of the Magistrate Judge recommending denying the Motion to Suppress of the Defendants Pablo Sergio Ortega-Estrada, Guillermo Torres-Rangel, Jorge Humberto Guzman-Zepeda, Arturo Hernandez-Martinez, and Jose Roberto Garcia-Limones. The Defendants have offered no authority in support of the argument that the Government was required to demonstrate the "credentials" of its contract interpreters. For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, there was probable cause to initiate electronic surveillance of the targeted telephones. The Defendants' other objections are without merit. The Court approves and adopts the Report and Recommendation as the judgment of the Court. The Defendants' Motions to Suppress are DENIED.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Ortega-Estrada

United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division
Oct 22, 2008
CRIMINAL FILE NO. 1:07-CR-356-TWT (N.D. Ga. Oct. 22, 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Ortega-Estrada

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. PABLO SERGIO ORTEGA-ESTRADA also known as…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division

Date published: Oct 22, 2008

Citations

CRIMINAL FILE NO. 1:07-CR-356-TWT (N.D. Ga. Oct. 22, 2008)

Citing Cases

United States v. Degaule

“In order to contest an order permitting the interception of communications, a defendant must establish that…

United States v. Morris

"In order to contest an order permitting the interception of communications, a defendant must establish that…