From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Novak

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 1, 2006
457 F.3d 981 (9th Cir. 2006)

Opinion

No. 04-55838.

August 1, 2006.

Brent A. Whittlesey, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney Civil Tax Divisions, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellant.

Martin S. Bakst, Encino, CA, for Defendant-Appellee.

Before MARY M. SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.


ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Judge Fisher is recused.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Novak

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 1, 2006
457 F.3d 981 (9th Cir. 2006)
Case details for

U.S. v. Novak

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Raymond P. NOVAK…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 1, 2006

Citations

457 F.3d 981 (9th Cir. 2006)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Novak

We reheard this appeal en banc to determine whether the government can garnish retirement plans covered by…