From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Nosal

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 27, 2011
661 F.3d 1180 (9th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 10–10038.

2011-10-27

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. David NOSAL, Defendant–Appellee.

Kyle Francis Waldinger, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, Jenny C. Ellickson, United States Attorney, Alexandria, VA, for Plaintiff–Appellant. Steven Francis Gruel, Esquire, Law Offices of Steven F. Gruel, Hanni Meena Fakhoury, Esquire, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Dennis P. Riordan, Riordan & Horgan, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants–Appellees.


Kyle Francis Waldinger, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Francisco, CA, Jenny C. Ellickson, United States Attorney, Alexandria, VA, for Plaintiff–Appellant. Steven Francis Gruel, Esquire, Law Offices of Steven F. Gruel, Hanni Meena Fakhoury, Esquire, Electronic Frontier Foundation, Dennis P. Riordan, Riordan & Horgan, San Francisco, CA, for Defendants–Appellees. D.C. No. 3:08–cr–00237–MHP–1.

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35–3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Nosal

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 27, 2011
661 F.3d 1180 (9th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. Nosal

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. DAVID NOSAL…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 27, 2011

Citations

661 F.3d 1180 (9th Cir. 2011)

Citing Cases

Wentworth-Douglass Hosp. v. Young & Novis Prof'l Ass'n

Moreover, after the parties submitted their briefs to this court, the Ninth Circuit agreed to rehear Nosal en…

Walsh Bishop Assocs., Inc. v. O'Brien

See Condux Int'l, Inc. v. Haugum, No. 08-4824, 2008 WL 5244818, at *4 & nn.3-4 (D. Minn. Dec. 15, 2008)…