From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Neadeau

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jul 13, 2009
Criminal No. 09-126(1) (DWF/RLE) (D. Minn. Jul. 13, 2009)

Opinion

Criminal No. 09-126(1) (DWF/RLE).

July 13, 2009

Clifford B. Wardlaw and Steven L. Schleicher, Assistant United States Attorneys, United States Attorney's Office, counsel for Plaintiff.

Bruce R. Williams, Esq., Williams Law Office, counsel for Defendant.


ORDER


Based upon the Report and Recommendation of Chief United States Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson, and after an independent review of the files, records and proceedings in the above-entitled matter,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained from a Wiretap (Doc. No. 84) is DENIED.

2. The Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained from Search and Seizure (Doc. No. 85) is DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Neadeau

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jul 13, 2009
Criminal No. 09-126(1) (DWF/RLE) (D. Minn. Jul. 13, 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Neadeau

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Marcus James Neadeau, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Jul 13, 2009

Citations

Criminal No. 09-126(1) (DWF/RLE) (D. Minn. Jul. 13, 2009)

Citing Cases

United States v. Gonzalez

Id. Similarly, the court in U.S. v. Neadeau, No. 09-126(1), 2009 WL 2155680 (D. Minn. July 13, 2009),…