From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. MUTO

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 18, 2009
08 Cr. 384 (DAB) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 18, 2009)

Opinion

08 Cr. 384 (DAB).

September 18, 2009


ORDER


The Court is in receipt of Defendant's Notice of Appearance and request to proceed pro se, as well as Defendant's Motion for Discovery. Prior to being permitted to proceed pro se for the purpose of that motion, Defendant shall appear before a Magistrate Judge to ensure that he is knowingly and voluntarily waiving his right to counsel under Faretta v. California, 422 U.S. 806 (1975); see also Torres v. United States, 140 F.3d 392, 402 (2d Cir. 1998) (noting that a court must ensure that a "defendant has knowingly and intelligently waived her right to counsel, . . . make a defendant aware of the dangers and disadvantages of self-representation," and "inform the defendant that she will be required to follow all the ground rules of trial procedure"). Based upon the review of the record before the Magistrate Judge the Court will make its determination on the propriety of the Defendant proceeding pro se. If the Defendant proceeds pro se the Court shall appoint standby counsel.

In anticipation of the Defendant proceeding pro se, the Government shall respond to the Motion for Discovery within 20 days of the date of this Order.

The trial in this matter, currently scheduled to begin on November 17, 2009, shall go forward on that date.

SO ORDERED


Summaries of

U.S. v. MUTO

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Sep 18, 2009
08 Cr. 384 (DAB) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 18, 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. MUTO

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. JOSEPH F. MUTO, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Sep 18, 2009

Citations

08 Cr. 384 (DAB) (S.D.N.Y. Sep. 18, 2009)