From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Lonebear

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 5, 2011
451 F. App'x 710 (9th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 10-30357 D.C. No. 1:09-cr-00136-RFC

10-05-2011

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. RICHARD EUGENE LONEBEAR, Defendant - Appellant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Appeal from the United States District Court

for the District of Montana

Richard F. Cebull, Chief Judge, Presiding


Before: HAWKINS, SILVERMAN, and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges.

Richard Eugene Lonebear appeals from the lifetime term of supervised release imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for abusive sexual contact, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1153(a) and 2244(a)(5). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Lonebear contends that the district court's imposition of a lifetime term of supervised release constitutes cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment, and is substantively unreasonable. The imposition of a lifetime term of supervised release is not unconstitutionally disproportionate given the circumstances of the case. See United States v. Williams, 636 F.3d 1229, 1232-1233 (9th Cir. 2011). The sentence is also substantively reasonable under the totality of the circumstances and in light of the sentencing factors set forth in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a). See United States v. Daniels, 541 F.3d 915, 922-23 (9th Cir. 2008); see also U.S.S.G. § 5D1.2(b) (policy statement) (recommending the maximum term of supervised release if the offense of conviction is a sex offense).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Lonebear

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Oct 5, 2011
451 F. App'x 710 (9th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. Lonebear

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. RICHARD EUGENE LONEBEAR…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Oct 5, 2011

Citations

451 F. App'x 710 (9th Cir. 2011)