From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Ewing

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jul 29, 2009
Crim. No. 09-103 (DSD/SRN) (D. Minn. Jul. 29, 2009)

Opinion

Crim. No. 09-103 (DSD/SRN).

July 29, 2009

Nate Petterson, Office of the United States Attorney, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for Plaintiff United States of America.

Andrea George, Office of the Federal Defender, 107 United States Courthouse, Minneapolis, Minnesota, for Defendant.

During a portion of the hearing on these motions, Defendant chose to represent himself. He later reconsidered his decision and elected to be represented by his previously-appointed counsel, Federal Defender Andrea George.


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Susan Richard Nelson. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed within the requisite time period. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Suppress Eyewitness Identifications (Doc. No. 16) is DENIED AS MOOT; Defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence Obtained as a Result of Search and Seizure (Doc. No. 18) is DENIED; and Defendant's Motion to Suppress Statements, Admissions and Answers (Doc. No. 19) is DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Ewing

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Jul 29, 2009
Crim. No. 09-103 (DSD/SRN) (D. Minn. Jul. 29, 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Ewing

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Samuel Johnson Ewing, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Jul 29, 2009

Citations

Crim. No. 09-103 (DSD/SRN) (D. Minn. Jul. 29, 2009)

Citing Cases

United States v. Morrison

In Mosley, the Supreme Court held that an interval of more than two hours constituted "the passage of a…