From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Coombs

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Nov 10, 2009
NO. CR 08-1253-FRZ-CRP (D. Ariz. Nov. 10, 2009)

Opinion

NO. CR 08-1253-FRZ-CRP.

November 10, 2009


ORDER


This matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and the local rules of practice of this Court for hearing and report and recommendation on Defendant's Motion to Suppress [20] and Motion to Suppress Statements [21].

On September 17, 2009, Magistrate Judge Charles R. Pyle conducted a hearing and on October 22, 2009 issued his Report and Recommendation [56]. A copy was sent to all parties. Neither party filed objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

The Court, having made an independent review of the record herein, orders as follows:

IT IS ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Pyle's Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED by this Court as the findings of fact and conclusions of law in this matter.

IT IS ORDERED that the Motion to Suppress [20] is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Suppress Statements [21] is DENIED IN PART and GRANTED IN PART as set forth in the Report and Recommendation.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Coombs

United States District Court, D. Arizona
Nov 10, 2009
NO. CR 08-1253-FRZ-CRP (D. Ariz. Nov. 10, 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Coombs

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff(s), v. Rohan S. Coombs, Defendant(s)

Court:United States District Court, D. Arizona

Date published: Nov 10, 2009

Citations

NO. CR 08-1253-FRZ-CRP (D. Ariz. Nov. 10, 2009)

Citing Cases

United States v. Lopez

ocedure 41, which governs warrants and was adopted by the Supreme Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2072(a),…

United States v. Lopez

(D.I. 99 at 19.)Moreover, and as detailed more fully in the court's September Opinion, at the time the GPS…