From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Clarkson

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 23, 2009
311 F. App'x 645 (4th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 08-6477.

Submitted: January 29, 2009.

Decided: February 23, 2009.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Asheville. Lacy H. Thornburg, District Judge. (1:08-mc-0005-LHT).

Robert B. Clarkson, Appellant Pro Se. Jill Westmoreland Rose, Office of the United States Attorney, Asheville, NC, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


The Appellant, Robert B. Clarkson, seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying his motion under Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(g) seeking return of evidence seized during a search and denying his motion for reconsideration. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2000), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2000); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The orders Clarkson seeks to appeal are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. See United States v. Reg'l Consulting Servs. for Econ. and Cmty. Dev., Inc., 766 F.2d 870, 874-75 (4th Cir. 1985). Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Clarkson

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 23, 2009
311 F. App'x 645 (4th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Clarkson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Robert B. CLARKSON, 515…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Feb 23, 2009

Citations

311 F. App'x 645 (4th Cir. 2009)