From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Cisneros

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 24, 2000
206 F.3d 448 (5th Cir. 2000)

Opinion

No. 98-40955.

February 24, 2000.

James Lee Turner (argued), Paula Camille Offenhauser, Asst. U.S. Atty., Houston, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

David L. Botsford (argued), Austin, TX, J.A. Canales, Jo Ellen Hewins, Canales Simonson, Corpus Christi, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal From the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas; Filemon B. Vela, Judge.

(Opinion Oct. 28, 1999, 5 Cir., 1999, 194 F.3d 626)

(Opinion on Panel Rehearing, Feb. 3, 2000, 5 Cir., 2000, 203 F.3d 333)

Before KING, Chief Judge, JOLLY, HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, JONES, SMITH, WIENER, BARKSDALE, EMILIO M. GARZA, DeMOSS, BENAVIDES, STEWART, PARKER and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.


BY THE COURT:

A majority of the judges in active service having determined, on the court's own motion, to rehear this case en banc,

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed,

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this cause shall be consolidated for purposes of briefing and argument with No. 98-40568, United States of America vs. Betty Louise Marek. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Cisneros

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 24, 2000
206 F.3d 448 (5th Cir. 2000)
Case details for

U.S. v. Cisneros

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE v. DORA GARCIA CISNEROS…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Feb 24, 2000

Citations

206 F.3d 448 (5th Cir. 2000)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Marek

We now adopt the position taken by the panel majority in Marek and hold that § 1958's use of a "facility in…

U.S. v. Cisneros

On February 24, 2000, the Fifth Circuit, sua sponte, granted a rehearing en banc. United States v. Cisneros,…