Summary
declining to conclude that warrant violated the particularity requirement despite lack of a street address when the executing officer had conducted surveillance at the residence to be searched
Summary of this case from United States v. BuisOpinion
NO. 2:07-CR-111.
November 10, 2008.
ORDER
This criminal matter is before the Court to consider the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge dated November 3, 2008. [Doc. 66]. The Magistrate Judge recommends that the defendant's motion and supplemental motion to suppress all evidence seized during the execution of a search warrant at his residence on April 18, 2006, be denied. The defendant has filed an objections to this report.
After careful and de novo consideration of the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, the defendant's objection to that Report and Recommendation, the defendant's motion to suppress, the defendant's supplemental motion to suppress, the responses of the government, the transcript of the hearings held on October 21 and 24, 2008, and for the reasons set out in that Report and Recommendation which are incorporated by reference herein, it is hereby ORDERED that defendant's objection to the Report and Recommendation is OVERRULED, that the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and APPROVED, and that the defendant's motion to suppress and supplemental motion to suppress are DENIED. [Docs. 27 and 37].