From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Brown

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Sep 14, 2009
Criminal No. 09-145 (JNE/RLE) (D. Minn. Sep. 14, 2009)

Summary

rejecting argument that vehicle parked at a residence is not "readily mobile," citing Pennsylvania v. Labron, 518 U.S. at 940

Summary of this case from United States v. Wilkins

Opinion

Criminal No. 09-145 (JNE/RLE).

September 14, 2009


ORDER


This case is before the Court on a Report and Recommendation issued by the Honorable Raymond L. Erickson, United States Magistrate Judge, on July 30, 2009. The magistrate judge recommended that Defendant's motion to suppress evidence be denied. Defendant objected. The Court has conducted a de novo review of the record. See D. Minn. LR 72.2(b). Based on that review, the Court adopts the Report and Recommendation. Therefore, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. Defendant's Motion for Suppression of Evidence Obtained as a Result of Search and Seizure [Docket No. 28] is DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Brown

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Sep 14, 2009
Criminal No. 09-145 (JNE/RLE) (D. Minn. Sep. 14, 2009)

rejecting argument that vehicle parked at a residence is not "readily mobile," citing Pennsylvania v. Labron, 518 U.S. at 940

Summary of this case from United States v. Wilkins
Case details for

U.S. v. Brown

Case Details

Full title:United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Patricia Ann Brown, a/k/a Patricia…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Sep 14, 2009

Citations

Criminal No. 09-145 (JNE/RLE) (D. Minn. Sep. 14, 2009)

Citing Cases

United States v. Clark

To the extent Defendant Kyle Clark argues that Officer Bendel was not permitted to shine his flashlight into…

United States v. Wilkins

Pennsylvania v. Labron, 518 U.S. at 940. See also United States v. Cowan, 674 F.3d 947, 956-957 (8th Cir.…