From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Barnett

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Mar 9, 2005
400 F.3d 481 (6th Cir. 2005)

Opinion

No. 04-5252.

March 9, 2005.

Before: BOGGS, Chief Judge; MARTIN, Circuit Judge; and GWIN, District Judge.

The Honorable James Gwin, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Ohio, sitting by designation.


ORDER

Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 35(c), less than a majority of the Judges of this Court in regular active service having voted to grant the request of a member of the Court for rehearing of this case en banc, the request for rehearing has been referred to the original panel.

The panel concludes that the issues raised in the request were fully considered upon the original submission and decision of the case. Accordingly, rehearing is denied.

The appellee's motion for an extension of time to file a petition for rehearing en banc is denied.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Barnett

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Mar 9, 2005
400 F.3d 481 (6th Cir. 2005)
Case details for

U.S. v. Barnett

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Yervin K. BARNETT…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Mar 9, 2005

Citations

400 F.3d 481 (6th Cir. 2005)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Hudson

Hudson concedes this, but maintains that he is nevertheless entitled to re-sentencing because it was plain…