From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Aguila-Montes

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 3, 2010
594 F.3d 1080 (9th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 05-50170.

February 3, 2010.

Mark R. Rehe, U.S. Attorney, Esquire, Office of the U.S. Attorney, San Diego, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Vincent James Brunkow, Esquire, Assistant Appellate Supervisor, Steven Francis Hubachek, Esquire, Federal Defenders of San Diego, Inc., San Diego, CA, Chase Scolnick, Assistant Federal Public Defender, FPDCA-Federal Public Defender's Office, Santa Ana, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.


ORDER


Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Aguila-Montes

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 3, 2010
594 F.3d 1080 (9th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Aguila-Montes

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Guillermo AGUILA-MONTES…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 3, 2010

Citations

594 F.3d 1080 (9th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. RICARDO CESAR CONTRERAS-DE LA TORRE

The sole issue in this case is whether or not Mr. Contreras' prior state conviction for residential burglary…

U.S. v. Mitchell

Aguila-Montes, however, is being reconsidered en banc and is no longer valid precedent in this circuit. 594…