From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. Financial Group v. Horizon Mgmt

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 15, 1985
476 So. 2d 771 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Opinion

Nos. 85-467, 85-570.

October 15, 1985.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Moie Tendrich, J.

Frank B. Pridgen, Miami, for appellants.

Smathers Thompson and Fernando S. Aran, Miami, for appellees.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and HUBBART and BASKIN, JJ.


We find no merit in any of the points raised on this appeal, see Waskin v. Waskin, 452 So.2d 999 (Fla. 3d DCA 1984), save one. We conclude that there was no basis in this case for an award of attorney's fees under Section 501.2105(1), Florida Statutes (1983). There is no showing in this case that a "consumer transaction," as defined in Section 501.203(1), Florida Statutes (1983), was the basis for the claim for damages herein, thereby rendering Section 501.2105(1), Florida Statutes (1983), inapplicable. The plaintiff was previously engaged in the affected business transactions herein prior to the business disputes sued upon, and, consequently, is not entitled to an award of attorney's fees under Section 501.2105(1), Florida Statutes (1983). Darrell Swanson Consolidated Services v. Davis, 433 So.2d 651 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983).

The final summary judgment under review is affirmed except for the attorney's fee award herein which is hereby reversed.

Affirmed in part; reversed in part.


Summaries of

U.S. Financial Group v. Horizon Mgmt

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Oct 15, 1985
476 So. 2d 771 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)
Case details for

U.S. Financial Group v. Horizon Mgmt

Case Details

Full title:U.S. FINANCIAL GROUP, INC., MITCHELL COMPANY, INC., J.G. MITCHELL COMPANY…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Oct 15, 1985

Citations

476 So. 2d 771 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1985)

Citing Cases

United Pacific Ins. Co. v. Berryhill

§ 501.203(1), Fla. Stat. (1987). Unless the transaction with Touch of Class was a "consumer transaction,"…

Glob. Tech Led, LLC v. Hilumz Int'l Corp.

But, in that version of the statute, the damages provision (Fla. Stat. 501.211(2)) allowed only "consumers"…