From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Urruchurtu v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 5, 2003
858 So. 2d 387 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Opinion

Case No. 3D03-1229.

Opinion filed November 5, 2003.

An appeal under Fla.R.App.P. 9.141(b)(2) from the Circuit Court for Dade County, Florida, Scott J. Silverman, Judge. Lower Tribunal No.:01-19346.

Alberto Urruchurtu, in proper person.

Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, for appellee.

Before COPE, SHEVIN, and WELLS, JJ.


The order under review is affirmed. See § 893.135(1)(j), Fla. Stat. (2000). The defendant was charged with, and ultimately convicted of and sentenced for, a crime that he committed on June 20, 2001. That crime and the minimum mandatory sentence that it carried, were first created by chapter 2000-320, section 4, Laws of Florida, page 3497 and became effective October 1, 2000. This amendment was not part of chapter 99-188, Laws of Florida but added entirely new provisions to section 893.135 and thus was not affected by any infirmity in chapter 99-188, by the decision in Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), or by enactment of chapter 2002-212, Laws of Florida.

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DISPOSED OF.


Summaries of

Urruchurtu v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 5, 2003
858 So. 2d 387 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)
Case details for

Urruchurtu v. State

Case Details

Full title:ALBERTO URRUCHURTU, Appellant, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Nov 5, 2003

Citations

858 So. 2d 387 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2003)

Citing Cases

Cordova v. State

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Wright v. State, 29 Fla. L. Weekly D521 (Fla. 2d DCA Feb. 27, 2004) (en banc);…

Wright v. State

Id. § 4, at 3497. As the Third District has recently noted, the addition of new drug offenses and the…