From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Urbieta Oil, Inc. v. Ruiz

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Mar 2, 2016
186 So. 3d 617 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)

Opinion

No. 3D15–704.

03-02-2016

URBIETA OIL, INC., Appellant, v. Vivianna RUIZ, Appellee.

Duane Morris LLP, Scott D. Kravetz and Richard D. Shane, for appellant. Rodier & Rodier and Brian M. Rodier, Hallandale, for appellee.


Duane Morris LLP, Scott D. Kravetz and Richard D. Shane, for appellant.

Rodier & Rodier and Brian M. Rodier, Hallandale, for appellee.

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Koster v. Sullivan, 160 So.3d 385 (Fla.2015); Morgan Stanley Smith Barney, LLC v. Gibraltar Private Bank & Trust Co., 162 So.3d 1058, 1060 (Fla. 3d DCA 2015)(stating “[i]f the return [of service] is regular on its face, then the service of process is presumed to be valid and the party challenging service has the burden of overcoming that presumption by clear and convincing evidence.”)(quoting Koster, 160 So.3d at 389).


Summaries of

Urbieta Oil, Inc. v. Ruiz

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Mar 2, 2016
186 So. 3d 617 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)
Case details for

Urbieta Oil, Inc. v. Ruiz

Case Details

Full title:Urbieta Oil, Inc., Appellant, v. Vivianna Ruiz, Appellee.

Court:Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Date published: Mar 2, 2016

Citations

186 So. 3d 617 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2016)