Opinion
No. 11-7225
05-08-2012
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. HAROLD DWIGHT WOOTEN, Defendant - Appellant.
Michael A. Grace, Sr., Christopher R. Clifton, GRACE, TISDALE & CLIFTON, P.A., Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellant. Ripley Rand, United States Attorney, Robert M. Hamilton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
UNPUBLISHED
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. James A. Beaty, Jr., Chief District Judge. (1:98-cr-00094-JAB-1)
Before KING, DAVIS, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael A. Grace, Sr., Christopher R. Clifton, GRACE, TISDALE & CLIFTON, P.A., Winston-Salem, North Carolina, for Appellant. Ripley Rand, United States Attorney, Robert M. Hamilton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Harold Dwight Wooten appeals the district court's order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no abuse of discretion by the district court. See United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (providing review standard). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Wooten, No. 1:98-cr-00094-JAB-1 (M.D.N.C. Aug. 30, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED