From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUBBOCK DIVISION
Apr 22, 2020
CASE NO. 5:20-CR-018-H -BQ-1 (N.D. Tex. Apr. 22, 2020)

Summary

finding extraordinary and compelling reasons warranting release where the defendant, who resided at a facility with a rapid spread of COVID-19, had asthma, bronchitis, and hypertension

Summary of this case from United States v. Johnson

Opinion

CASE NO. 5:20-CR-018-H -BQ-1

04-22-2020

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. D'ARDE LEE WILLIAMS


REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION ON PLEA BEFORE THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This case has been referred by the United States district judge to the undersigned for the taking of a guilty plea. The parties have consented to appear before a United States magistrate judge for these purposes. This Report and Recommendation on Plea is submitted to the Court under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(3).

Under authority granted by Congress in the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) and based upon findings by the United States Judicial Conference that emergency conditions exist that materially affect the functioning of the Court, Chief Judge Barbara M. G. Lynn issued Special Order 13-9 in which she specifically found that felony pleas under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11 cannot be conducted in person without seriously jeopardizing public health and safety. As a result, Special Order 13-9 authorizes the use of video teleconferencing for taking felony guilty pleas in particular cases where the district judge has made a finding that the plea cannot be further delayed without serious harm to the interests of justice. Upon the joint motion of both parties, the district judge has made such a finding in this case.

The defendant appeared via video teleconference with counsel before the undersigned United States magistrate judge who addressed the defendant personally in open court and informed the defendant of, and determined that the defendant understood, the admonitions contained in Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

The defendant pleaded guilty (under a written plea bargain agreement with the government) to Count One of the Indictment charging defendant with a violation of 18 U .S.C. § 751(a), that is, Escape from Federal Custody. The undersigned magistrate judge finds the following:

1. The defendant, upon advice of counsel, has consented orally and in writing to enter this guilty plea before a magistrate judge, subject to final approval and sentencing by the presiding district judge;

2. The defendant fully understands the nature of the charges (including each essential element of the offense(s) charged) and penalties;

3. The defendant fully understands the terms of the plea agreement and plea agreement supplement;

4. The defendant understands all constitutional and statutory rights and wishes to waive these rights, including the right to a trial by jury and the right to appear before a United States district judge;

5. The defendant's plea is made freely and voluntarily;

6. The defendant is competent to enter this plea of guilty;

7. There is a factual basis for this plea; and

8. The ends of justice are served by acceptance of the defendant's plea of guilty.

Although I have conducted these proceedings and recommend acceptance of the defendant's plea of guilty, the United States district judge has the power to review my actions and possesses final decision-making authority in this proceeding. Thus, if the defendant has any objections to these findings or any other action of the undersigned, he is required to make those known to the United States district judge within fourteen (14) days of today.

Based on the above, I recommend that the defendant's plea of guilty be accepted, that the defendant be adjudged guilty, and that sentence be imposed accordingly.

Signed April 22, 2020.

/s/ _________

D. GORDON BRYANT, JR.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

United States v. Williams

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUBBOCK DIVISION
Apr 22, 2020
CASE NO. 5:20-CR-018-H -BQ-1 (N.D. Tex. Apr. 22, 2020)

finding extraordinary and compelling reasons warranting release where the defendant, who resided at a facility with a rapid spread of COVID-19, had asthma, bronchitis, and hypertension

Summary of this case from United States v. Johnson
Case details for

United States v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. D'ARDE LEE WILLIAMS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUBBOCK DIVISION

Date published: Apr 22, 2020

Citations

CASE NO. 5:20-CR-018-H -BQ-1 (N.D. Tex. Apr. 22, 2020)

Citing Cases

United States v. York

Since the enactment of the First Step Act, district courts in the Fifth Circuit have held that § 1B1.13 is…

United States v. Williams

See § 1B1.13(1)(A) & cmt. 1. However, since the enactment of the First Step Act, district courts in the Fifth…