From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Webb

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 20, 2012
469 F. App'x 233 (4th Cir. 2012)

Opinion

No. 11-7620

03-20-2012

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TYRONE F. WEBB, Defendant - Appellant.

Tyrone F. Webb, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes, Assistant United States Attorney, James Chris Leventis, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (3:93-cr-0007-CMC-1)

Before DUNCAN and FLOYD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tyrone F. Webb, Appellant Pro Se. Stacey Denise Haynes, Assistant United States Attorney, James Chris Leventis, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Tyrone F. Webb appeals a district court order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We affirm. Because the amendment in question did not lower Webb's Guidelines sentence, we find the district did not abuse its discretion denying the motion. United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir. 2004) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

United States v. Webb

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Mar 20, 2012
469 F. App'x 233 (4th Cir. 2012)
Case details for

United States v. Webb

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff - Appellee, v. TYRONE F. WEBB…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Mar 20, 2012

Citations

469 F. App'x 233 (4th Cir. 2012)