From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Van Stelton

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Mar 26, 1993
988 F.2d 70 (8th Cir. 1993)

Summary

refusing to entertain an appeal because "a corporation cannot appear pro se." (citing Carr, 698 F.2d at 953)

Summary of this case from Native American Council of Tribes v. Weber

Opinion

No. 92-3874.

Submitted March 19, 1993.

Decided March 26, 1993.

Appellants were not represented by counsel.

Willis A. Buell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Sioux City, IA, for appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa, Edward J. McManus, Senior Judge, U.S.D.C.

Before BOWMAN, MAGILL, and MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judges.


Virgil J. and Carol Van Stelton and Van Stelton Farms, Ltd., appeal the district court's entry of judgment in favor of the United States in this foreclosure action filed on behalf of the Farmers Home Administration. We affirm.

The Honorable Edward J. McManus, Senior United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa.

The Van Steltons argue that the district court lacked jurisdiction, that the district court failed to require the United States to hold a settlement conference, and that a copy of the motion for summary judgment filed by the United States was never served upon them. They also argue that the United States failed to register with the Iowa Secretary of State as a foreign corporation and that as a result, it could not conduct business within the state. We reject each of these arguments as meritless. Van Stelton Farms, Ltd., a corporation, is not a party to this appeal because it is not represented by counsel, and a corporation cannot appear pro se. See Carr Enters., Inc. v. United States, 698 F.2d 952, 953 (8th Cir. 1983) (per curiam).

Accordingly, we affirm.


Summaries of

United States v. Van Stelton

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Mar 26, 1993
988 F.2d 70 (8th Cir. 1993)

refusing to entertain an appeal because "a corporation cannot appear pro se." (citing Carr, 698 F.2d at 953)

Summary of this case from Native American Council of Tribes v. Weber

refusing to entertain an appeal because "Van Stelton Farms, Ltd., a corporation, is not a party to this appeal because it is not represented by counsel and a corporation cannot appear pro se." (citing Carr, 698 F.2d at 953)

Summary of this case from Native American Council of Tribes v. Weber

noting that a corporation may not appear pro se

Summary of this case from Transgenomic, Inc. v. POWER3 Medical Products, Inc.

noting that a corporation may not appear pro se

Summary of this case from AG FOOD ASSOCIATES, LLC v. WHITEBOX ADVISORS, LLC

noting that a corporation may not appear pro se

Summary of this case from Daniels Manufacturing Company v. MS Distributing

noting that a corporation may not appear pro se

Summary of this case from RSG Inc. v. Sidump'r Trailer Company, Inc.

noting that a corporation may not appear pro se

Summary of this case from Mapes v. Wellington Capital Group

noting that a corporation may not appear pro se

Summary of this case from PLAN PROS INC. v. TORCZON

noting that a corporation may not appear pro se

Summary of this case from Financial Federal Credit Inc. v. Wills

noting that a corporation may not appear pro se

Summary of this case from Local 22 Int. B. of Elec. Work. v. Jubilee Partners

noting that a corporation may not appear pro se

Summary of this case from Local 22 Int'l Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Jubilee Partners

noting that a corporation may not appear pro se

Summary of this case from Lefler v. Baum

noting that a corporation may not appear pro se

Summary of this case from Healthcare Management Solutions, Inc. v. Hartle

noting that a corporation may not appear pro se

Summary of this case from Barta v. Canarx Services, Inc.

noting that a corporation may not appear pro se

Summary of this case from SHERMAN v. SHANGLI JIN XIN EXPORT FIREWORKS FACTORY

noting that a corporation may not appear pro se

Summary of this case from American Title, Inc. v. Genisys Financial Corporation
Case details for

United States v. Van Stelton

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, v. VIRGIL J. VAN STELTON; CAROL VAN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Mar 26, 1993

Citations

988 F.2d 70 (8th Cir. 1993)

Citing Cases

Welspun Tubular LLC v. Phenix Energy Grp.

Corporations cannot appear in federal court without legal representation. United States v. Lylalele, Inc.,…

Waller v. Blast Fitness Grp. LLC

No mention is made of any replacement counsel entering an appearance for these defendants. (Docs. 34, 35.)…