From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Turner

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Oct 17, 1978
584 F.2d 1389 (8th Cir. 1978)

Summary

ruling on the merits without addressing jurisdiction

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Bloomer

Opinion

No. 78-1484.

Submitted October 10, 1978.

Decided October 17, 1978.

J. Justin Meehan of Howard, Singer Meehan, St. Louis, Mo., for appellant.

Robert D. Kingsland, U.S. Atty. and Bruce D. White, Asst. U.S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., for appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri.

Before HEANEY, STEPHENSON and HENLEY, Circuit Judges.


The sole issue in this appeal is whether the District Court abused its discretion by limiting the fee of counsel appointed to represent a defendant in a criminal case pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act to $250. The trial lasted approximately one-half day.

We find no abuse of discretion. The award was made pursuant to guidelines adopted on June 7, 1973 by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, and approved by this Court on June 13, 1973.

The judgment of the District Court is affirmed.


Summaries of

United States v. Turner

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
Oct 17, 1978
584 F.2d 1389 (8th Cir. 1978)

ruling on the merits without addressing jurisdiction

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Bloomer

In United States v. Turner, 584 F.2d 1389 (8th Cir. 1978) (per curiam), a panel of the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals held a district court did not abuse its discretion in limiting a CJA award to $250.00.

Summary of this case from In re Carlyle

allowing appeal where jurisdictional issue not raised

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Smith
Case details for

United States v. Turner

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, v. LONNIE TURNER. J. JUSTIN MEEHAN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit

Date published: Oct 17, 1978

Citations

584 F.2d 1389 (8th Cir. 1978)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Stone

No circuit has explicitly held the other way. While both the Eighth and the Fourth Circuits have reviewed the…

U.S. v. Smith

Two Circuits have not directly confronted the jurisdictional issue but allowed review. See United States v.…