From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Raupp

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Mar 9, 2012
673 F.3d 638 (7th Cir. 2012)

Summary

treating Sentencing Commission's applica- tion notes as authoritative interpretations of Sentencing Guidelines deserving deference

Summary of this case from Exelon Generation Co. v. Local 15

Opinion

No. 11–2215.

2012-03-9

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Anthony RAUPP, Defendant–Appellant.


Editor's Note: The opinion of the United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit, in U.S. v. Raupp, published in the advance sheet at this citation, 673 F.3d 638, was withdrawn from the bound volume because it has been amended and superseded. See 2012 WL 1229368.


Summaries of

United States v. Raupp

United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
Mar 9, 2012
673 F.3d 638 (7th Cir. 2012)

treating Sentencing Commission's applica- tion notes as authoritative interpretations of Sentencing Guidelines deserving deference

Summary of this case from Exelon Generation Co. v. Local 15
Case details for

United States v. Raupp

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Anthony RAUPP…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Date published: Mar 9, 2012

Citations

673 F.3d 638 (7th Cir. 2012)

Citing Cases

United States v. Salahuddin

In making his argument, however, Cooper improperly equates the elements of attempt with the elements of…

Exelon Generation Co. v. Local 15, Int'l Bhd. of Elec. Workers, AFL–CIO

Moreover, in the same chapter as the amended access regulations, the Commission has provided: “Except as…