From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. O'Neill

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 21, 2023
Cr. 19-331 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 21, 2023)

Opinion

Cr. 19-331

03-21-2023

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. SUE O'NEILL


RESPONSE TO CORRESPONDENCE

Marilyn J. Horan, United States District Judge

Defendant Sue O'Neill has submitted correspondence to the Court. This case was originally assigned to Senior District Judge Donetta W. Ambrose, who assumed inactive status on February 1, 2022. On March 16, 2023, this case was reassigned to the undersigned, District Judge Marilyn J. Horan. In her correspondence, Ms. O'Neill discusses certain aspects of the Bureau of Prison's (BOP) management of her obligations under the Inmate Financial Responsibility Program (IFRP). ECF No. 60. Ms. O'Neill does not directly request that the Court take any action, instead she states that she seeks clarification regarding her financial obligation payments while in prison. ECF No. 60, at 1, 2.

“The Inmate Financial Responsibility Program, 28 C.F.R. §§ 545.10 and 545.11, is a voluntary work program instituted by the BOP and intended to encourage ‘each sentenced inmate to meet his or her legitimate financial obligations.' 28 C.F.R. § 545.10. Among those ‘legitimate financial obligations' are the payment of ‘[c]ourt-ordered restitution' and ‘[f]ines and court costs.' 28 C.F.R. § 545.11(a).” Folk v. Gibson, No. 3:18-CV-1948, 2022 WL 1295411, at *1 (M.D. Pa. Apr. 29, 2022) (resolving petitioner's writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, in which petitioner raised challenges to the deductions of funds pursuant to IFRP). “The IFRP can be an important part of a prisoner's efforts toward rehabilitation, but strictly speaking, participation in the program is voluntary[;] ... an inmate in the Bureau of Prisons' custody may lose certain privileges by not participating in the IFRP, but the inmate's participation cannot be compelled.” United States v. Snyder, 601 Fed.Appx. 67, 70 (3d Cir. 2015) (quotation and citation omitted). Accordingly, it is the BOP who manages an inmate's obligations under the IFRP. With respect to challenges to the BOP's management of an inmate's IRFP, as Judge Ambrose explained to Ms. O'Neill in 2021, “[c]hallenges to payments an inmate is required to make through the Inmate Financial Responsibly Program (‘IFRP') must be brought through a petition filed under 28 U.S.C. §2241 in the district where the inmate is confined.” Mem. Order, Dec. 29, 2021, at 1 (ECF No. 59). Ms. O'Neill remains incarcerated at FPC Alderson in the Southern District of West Virginia, therefore, to the extent she is attempting to raise a section 2241 challenge to payments under the IFRP in the Western District of Pennsylvania, this Court lacks jurisdiction to consider such a challenge.


Summaries of

United States v. O'Neill

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 21, 2023
Cr. 19-331 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 21, 2023)
Case details for

United States v. O'Neill

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. SUE O'NEILL

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 21, 2023

Citations

Cr. 19-331 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 21, 2023)